I wanna book her for PSE but maybe next time , let me had a good prep. She got her pussy shaved and so clean, so lick her on her clit. I think she likes it. Her full service was excellent. I was keen to do anal or rimming. Next visit I guess.
She holds natural beauty, very attractive in person and natural tits. Her nipss were tasty and loved to played with. She was pretty and got a seducing vibe, makes me hard from start til end.
Let's say she was still worth it. And still gave a agreeable average session. Would love to do a second try and maybe she can offer now a better extras.
She was accurate same on photos, natural. Very sexy and body. She was on her 30's but looking young on her age. Her massage skills were damn soothing and service were ace. 69 and bbj are the best.
Tasha was a charming Aussie girl.Loved her glamorous presence. She was tall, with curvy body and perfect boobs. I would not gonna lie but her massage skills were indeed sensual. She really set a standard of a superb full service and her pussy was so sweet.
There's a human being behind the profile, and I think she came through for me. She made it feel like a person, and I noticed. Picture her: about 22, early 20s, about 5'3", on the small side, standing by the window while I took my coat off. It was easy to forget she was doing a job, and that's a good thing. I hope she keeps doing this for a while. I'll be around to see.
I booked her through Empire and the whole thing was straight. As for the person: about 22, early 20s, about 5'4", average height, and the size was small, but the listing didn't lie. It was a fair session, neither more nor less than what was quoted. No hidden extras.
In my view the question is whether the experience matched the profile, and it did. On the facts, the person was younger than I expected, just 19, petite, about 5'1" and smaller than I'd pictured, but fine. On the facts, neither more nor less than expected. The evidence supports a recommendation.
Fair test, fair result. That's how I'll do it. The observations were fair, and the conclusion is fair. The cost was 150 an hour. The conclusion doesn't change at that price. The person, on observation, was about 22, early 20s, about 5'4", average height and the size was small, but the listing didn't lie. On the evidence, she's a pass. I check the instruments before I trust the reading. The instruments checked out.
It was a gentle sort of thing, and I'll tell you about it. She was about 27, really petite, about 5'0", and everything felt soft and unhurried. A kind session, and I'd go back. She was sweet about it, and that's enough for me.
I write the way I litigate: state the facts, then offer a view. On the facts, the person was early 20s, about 5'4", average height and smaller than the photo made her look. On the facts, the experience matched the profile, and I'll note that. The evidence supports a recommendation. No complaints.
I keep it factual, so here's what happened. The person was late 20s, about 27, really petite, about 5'0" and small in size, about what the listing said. Facts are facts. I'll be straight with you.
What struck me first was how clean the whole setup was. As for the person: early 20s, and her age matched the profile, about 5'5", average height. smaller than I'd pictured, but fine. The whole thing felt hygienic and cared for, which I notice. She's the kind I'd tell my sisters about. I'm French-Australian, so I notice when the little courtesies are there. They were.
I keep a log of these because I like to know if the session holds up, and this one did. A solid session, in a chill way. Log entry: mid-20s, tall, about 5'8". I keep teh notes so teh next person doesn't have to guess. Worth teh hour, easy. The pace held up.
Here's the scene, and then I'll tell you how it went down. Picture the player: 19, and she looked every bit of it, petite, about 5'0". G:The ticket was 250 an hour. For the show, that's a steal. The room ran to her, and that's how you know. She set the tempo, and it stayed up all session. A strong showing, and it held up to the final whistle. The crowd matters. The room was a good crowd.
I went for a session, and I'll start with what I noticed. She was about 19, about 5'2", on the small side, and more present than I expected. She was easy to read, and easy to like. She's a person doing a job, and I think that's worth saying. I could tell she was genuine.
I'll run it like a proper test: observations first, then the conclusion. Observation: the person was early to mid 20s, about 5'5", average height. The data doesn't argue. On the evidence, she's a pass, and I'll note it. Fair test, fair result, and I won't overstate it. The observations support a recommendation. I don't overstate and I don't undersell. The observation is the conclusion.
I'll be straight with you: I went in to see what it was like. She was 19, and she looked every bit of it, about 5'2", on the small side, and it matched the listing, end to end. That's the thing, it was what it said it was. I check the foundation before the paint.
From a value perspective, I want to know if the hour is worth the rate. Violate and such weird name but she was nice. Cold type and speaks when ask only,she was naturally sexy and attractive. She was daring and pleasing to her service. I was waiting for her to squirt, nextime i guess she would do it.
I went here and book her for 175 an hour, and I think that's a really good price for the way she made you feel. She was so nice to me. A hotty and sexy body, did a doggy with her, she suck balls and lick her boobs. All her was a perfect scoring. Worth the price and for a second one soon.
I dont do a lot of small talk, but she made it easy. She looked early to mid 20s, about 5'5", average height, no surprises. No worries, she delivered, and that's teh lot.
I won't overstate or undersell, so here's what the observations were. The cost was 300 an hour. The conclusion doesn't change at that price. On the evidence, she's a pass, and I'll note it. Observation: the person was early 20s, and her age matched the profile, about 5'3", on the small side. The data doesn't argue. The observations support a recommendation. I don't overstate and I don't undersell. The observation is the conclusion.