I've been wanting to see Chako for a while being a fan of thicker girls, and the reviews on here and her updated profile pictures sealed the deal. Chako greeted me warmly and was straight away into the GFE style, which admittedly I prefer over PSE or service queen routines.
Her new pictures are reasonably accurate, but definitely have a face filter applied. She is cute, however, so no issues there. Unfortunately she has got no ass. Zero. My attraction to thick girls is on the assumption they have the ass to match, but that’s not the case here unfortunately.
Thankfully attitude and service were enough to make up for it. All the diamond services on offer as you would expect. She does struggle with DT, but if you like a little bit of gagging you might be pleased. The silver lining is that getting past that initial restriction at the back of her throat feels amazing, and with Chako initiating the act this was actually one of the highlights. She looked good in certain angles, but as mentioned she doesn’t have the body for doggy or reverse cow girl. I finished with her doing Asian CG, with her tight pussy draining me.
Loved her flawless skin, so stunning. Coco was nice to be with, she initiate small talks and share some good topics She even gave me a passionate kiss, bj on shower. She was tall or maybe her toes did.. Would love to see her if I have enough money. 1 hr session wouldn't be enough.
Fair test, fair result. That's how I'll do it. Observation: the person was about 22, early 20s, about 5'3", on the small side. The data doesn't argue. On the evidence, she's a pass, and I'll note it. The observations were clear, and the conclusion is simple. The observations support a recommendation. No notes. I set up a fair test: controls, observations, conclusion.
Fair test, fair result. That's how I'll do it. The observations were fair, and the conclusion is fair. The cost was 150 an hour. The conclusion doesn't change at that price. The person, on observation, was about 22, early 20s, about 5'4", average height and the size was small, but the listing didn't lie. On the evidence, she's a pass. I check the instruments before I trust the reading. The instruments checked out.
I'll run it like a proper test: set the control, make the observations, then the conclusion. The person, on observation, was early 20s, about 5'3", average height and a good size. The cost was 300 an hour. The conclusion doesn't change at that price. On the evidence, she's a pass, and I'll note it. Fair test, fair result, and I won't overstate it. The observations support a recommendation. I check the instruments before I trust the reading. The instruments checked out.
As a retired to business person,made some visit here to chill and get a good sex. She smells good and shaved pussy. She's clean and I could feel it. Big boobs and nice licking. Eat her pusst and she moans at it. she has an average height but so many potentials on bed. I would recommend her
I'll run it like a proper test: observations first, then the conclusion. Observation: the person was early to mid 20s, about 5'5", average height. The data doesn't argue. On the evidence, she's a pass, and I'll note it. Fair test, fair result, and I won't overstate it. The observations support a recommendation. I don't overstate and I don't undersell. The observation is the conclusion.
She was literally beautiful and charming. She got a simple name, and ,masked like a porn star. She was damn hot and enjoyed every bit of hers. I guess no enhanced on her, all were natural.
I won't overstate or undersell, so here's what the observations were. The cost was 300 an hour. The conclusion doesn't change at that price. On the evidence, she's a pass, and I'll note it. Observation: the person was early 20s, and her age matched the profile, about 5'3", on the small side. The data doesn't argue. The observations support a recommendation. I don't overstate and I don't undersell. The observation is the conclusion.
